He therefore wrote:--
"DEAR SIR,--I have just read yours of the 19th instant, addressed to
myself through the New York 'Tribune.'
"If there be in it any statements or assumptions of fact which I may
know to be erroneous, I do not now and here controvert them.
"If there be any inferences which I believe to be falsely drawn, I do
not now and here argue against them.
"If there be perceptible in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I
waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always
supposed to be right.
"As to the policy 'I seem to be pursuing,' as you say, I have not meant
to leave any one in doubt. I would save the Union. I would save it in
the shortest way under the Constitution.
"The sooner the national authority can be restored, the nearer the Union
will be,--the Union as it was.
"If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at
the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them.
"If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at
the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them.
"_My paramount object is to save the Union, and not either to save or
destroy slavery_.
"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it.
And if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it. And if
I could save it by freeing some, and leaving others alone, I would also
do that.
Pages:
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120